(Un)healthy lifestylesEducation as a dividing line

5 / 13

Family and lifestyle habits

Authors: Stéfanie André, Roza Meuleman and Gerbert Kraaykamp

Social-scientific research shows that parents exert a major influence in many ways on the preferences and behaviours of their children (Kraaykamp 2009). A good deal is also known about the intergenerational transfer of lifestyle characteristics, such as risky behaviours (Ten Cate et al. 2013; De Neve & Kawachi 2017); see also Education as a dividing line.

Researchers often assume that tastes and preferences deployed in parenting are transmitted both through (conscious) instruction and through (subconscious) role model behaviour (Kraaykamp 2009). Instruction is concerned with the structuring of behaviour by providing rules and structures. Role model behaviour, or ‘modelling’, is about subconscious learning, in which the behaviours of key role models are automatically adopted. Since parents are key role models for their children, we assume that they are also important in the development of preferences in terms of health-related behaviour.

Here we use the parental educational level as an indicator, based on the assumption that the cultural and financial resources associated with education are closely related to the lifestyle preferences that are central to this study. We look at the highest educational level attained by (one of the two) parents.

Educational level of parents, smoking and alcohol consumption

Figure 5.1 reveals no relevant differences in smoking based on parental educational level; smoking appears to be explained more by the educational level of the respondent themselves than that of their parents; see also Health-related behaviour in the Netherlands.

Figure 5.1Smoking by educational level of parents

low 28
higher secondary 22,2
higher professional (HBO) 21,5
university (WO) 23,4

aSmoking here includes smoking every day as well as smoking less regularly than every day. For more information on the variables, see Acknowledgements and sources.

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (N=1,415)

Figure 5.2 shows regular alcohol consumption in the Netherlands is closely linked to the educational level of the family in which the respondent grew up. Similar to the differences in alcohol consumption by own educational level, we find that people with university-educated parents, in particular, consume alcohol regularly: 59.2% versus less than 40% of respondents with parents with a lower educational level; see also Health-related behaviour in the Netherlands.

Daily alcohol consumption is also associated with parental educational level. Among respondents with university-educated parents, 14.2% drinks every day, compared with around half those whose parents are educated to intermediate and higher professional level. It is also interesting to note that those with the lowest-educated parents and the highest-educated parents show the greatest correspondence in alcohol consumption, so that the preferences of the two extremes in the educational distribution resemble each other quite closely. It is however likely that, given that this is an expression of lifestyle, the type of alcohol (beer, wine, spirits) will differ considerably.

Figure 5.2Alcohol consumption by parental education

drinks daily drinks regularly
low 11,9 39,2
higher secondary 6,9 39,7
higher professional (HBO) 6,8 36,1
university (WO) 14,2 59,2

aMore than once per week

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (N=1,415)

Social mobility and health-related behaviour

Although people generally tend to resemble their parents, including as regards their education, it is interesting to examine whether people who have risen or fallen on the social ladder exhibit different habits from their parents. It seems likely that people whose social position has remained stable (who have attained the same educational level as their parents) will behave in a way that conforms to their group, while upwardly and downwardly mobile persons will show a mix of the lifestyle preferences of two educational groups (namely those of their parental milieu and that associated with their own present educational level).

Table 5.1 first shows how many people have risen or fallen relative to their parents in terms of educational level. People on the diagonal are stable (44.5%): they have attained the same educational level as their parents. 48.8% have risen up the scale, while 6.7% have fallen compared with their parents (in the Netherlands, 2014). This picture corresponds with the expansion in education which has taken place in the Netherlands since the 1960s, which has seen a growing proportion of the Dutch population participate in (higher) education.

Table 5.1Mobility by education of parents and child

Level of education of child

Level of

low

higher secondary

high

education

low

27.8

24.7

14.1

parents

higher secondary

2.2

7.6

10.0

high

0.9

3.6

9.1

(n)

(438)

(508)

(469)

(1415)

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (N=1,415)

Table 5.2 presents the same data in the form of a transition matrix. The rows in this matrix add up to 100% and, as in table 5.1, we see that most children are upwardly mobile in comparison with their parents.

Table 5.2Transition matrix: education of parents and child

Level of education of child

Level of

low

higher secondary

high

total

education

low

42

37

21

100

parents

higher secondary

11

39

50

100

high

7

26

67

100

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (N=1,415)

Alcohol consumption
We then look at whether someone’s educational mobility is related to their alcohol consumption. Figure 5.3 shows that downwardly mobile respondents with university-educated parents are most often regular drinkers (64.0%); among other downwardly mobile respondents the figure is only around 35%. Drinking alcohol regularly is apparently more accepted among people with a university background, and downwardly mobile children from this group adhere more to the lifestyle in which they were brought up, regardless of the educational level they themselves attain; see also Health-related behaviour in the Netherlands.

The differences among respondents with an educational level which is the same as that of their parents are not very pronounced. Stable higher professional (hbo) graduates, in particular, are relatively moderate in their alcohol consumption.

Upwardly socially mobile respondents tend to drink regularly more often than socially stable respondents; in particular, university graduates who have risen up the social ladder (with hbo-educated parents) drink relatively often on a regular basis (50.8%).

Figure 5.3Regular alcohol consumption by educational mobility and parental educational level

low higher secondary higher professional (HBO) university (WO)
downwardly mobile 36,6 34,9 64
stable 33,3 44,9 27,7 42,7
upwardly mobile 42,7 35,3 50,8

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (N=1,415)

A European comparison (see figure 5.4) reveals clear country differences in the frequency of drinking alcohol regularly among downwardly socially mobile, socially stable and upwardly socially mobile respondents. It shows that in Lithuania and Portugal downwardly socially mobile people with an intermediate education are more likely to drink regularly, while in Germany and the United Kingdom this is more frequent among the upwardly socially mobile people with an intermediate education, for example.

Figure 5.4Social mobility and regular alcohol consumption in Europe by level of education

The Netherlands
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 39,5 40,8
stable 35,9 50,4 47,7
upwardly mobile 46,6 35,3
Belgium
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 36,5 44,6
stable 30,3 34,1 45,7
upwardly mobile 40,5 37,7
Denmark
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 33,7 19,6
stable 33,7 28,1 37,7
upwardly mobile 33,3 36,9
Germany
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 29,3 30,6
stable 18,6 30,1 35,9
upwardly mobile 30,2 39,6
Estonia
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 16,5 14,7
stable 11,7 10,3 14,4
upwardly mobile 9 11
Finland
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 10,3 11
stable 10,5 12,3 20,4
upwardly mobile 16,1 12,8
France
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 28,1 35
stable 30 28,3 45,9
upwardly mobile 28,9 32,9
Ireland
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 3,8 18,3
stable 15 17,4 28,8
upwardly mobile 20,1 19,1
Lithuania
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 27,7 13,8
stable 18 10,4 8,9
upwardly mobile 5,4 5,5
Norway
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 13,9 26,4
stable 12,5 12,5 24,9
upwardly mobile 17,6 21,5
Austria
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 28,1 32
stable 23,6 22,9 27,7
upwardly mobile 27,4 31,4
Poland
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 20,8 25,2
stable 10,3 16,5 12,1
upwardly mobile 8 12,7
Portugal
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 44,5 5,7
stable 38,3 27,7 27
upwardly mobile 28,9 19,2
Slovenia
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 26,4 27,7
stable 22,7 14,2 25,8
upwardly mobile 20,2 16,9
Spain
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 24,9 14,5
stable 29,7 27,3 42,3
upwardly mobile 29,4 32,4
Czech Republic
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 18 15,4
stable 24,3 12,5 21,6
upwardly mobile 17,9 21,5
United Kingdom
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 30 36,1
stable 26,6 35,8 40,8
upwardly mobile 35,3 44,1
Sweden
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 24,1 20
stable 17,9 16,8 19,2
upwardly mobile 18,6 20,5
Switzerland
low education intermediate education high education
downwardly mobile 28,4 27,6
stable 27,3 32,7 43,6
upwardly mobile 29,8 39,5

Source:European Social Survey Netherlands, Round 7, 2014-2015 (n=25,538)

Social and physical mobility

We see from figure 5.5 that those with a university education most often engage in intensive physical activity, regardless of whether they are upwardly socially mobile or stable. Relatively speaking, downwardly mobile respondents with university-educated parents also engage in physical activity just as often as university graduates. Among socially stable respondents, we see that those with a low educational level and from a low-educated background least often engage in physical activity (70.6%). Here, the parents’ educational level is more important than the respondent’s own educational level. One possible explanation may be that lack of physical activity is passed on from parent to child.

Figure 5.5Physical activity by educational mobility and educational level

low higher secondary higher professional (HBO) university (WO)
downwardly mobile 91,2 85 91,2
stable 70,6 85,6 78,8 88,7
upwardly mobile 83,4 84 93

References

Cate, A. ten, T. Huijts & G. Kraaykamp (2013). Intergenerationele overdracht van risicogedrag. Rookgedrag, alcoholgebruik en ongezonde eetgewoonten van ouders en hun volwassen kinderen. In: Mens en Maatschappij, jg. 88, nr. 2, p. 150-176.

Kraaykamp, G. (2009). Culturele socialisatie: een zegen en een vloek. Verbreding en verdieping in het sociologisch onderzoek naar langetermijneffecten van culturele opvoeding (inaugural lecture). Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.

Neve, J.W. de & I. Kawachi (2017). Spillovers between siblings and from offspring to parents are understudied. A review and future directions for research. In: Social Science & Medicine, vol. 183, pp. 56-61.

Cite this card

André, S., R. Meuleman and G. Kraaykamp (2018). Family and lifestyle habits. In: (Un)healthy lifestyles: Education as a dividing line. Retrieved [datum vandaag] from https://digital.scp.nl/lifestyles/family-and-lifestyle-habits.

Information notes

Social mobility.